Тип публикации: статья из журнала
Год издания: 2020
Идентификатор DOI: 10.17150/2500-4255.2020.14(5).660-675
Ключевые слова: corruption, prevention of corruption, security measures, anti-corruption criminological security, anti-corruption standards of behavior, a prohibition of gift-giving, ordinary gift, bribery, insignificance of deed, anti-corruption mentality
Аннотация: A prohibition for persons holding government (municipal) positions, for government (municipal) employees, and some other employees of the public sphere who are public officials to receive remuneration (gifts) is aimed at preventing bribery (Art 290, 291, 291.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation), and could be viewed as Показать полностьюa measure of anti-corruption criminological security. However, the existing collisions of civil, administrative and criminal law norms that regulate this prohibition lead to an ongoing discussion in research publications and complexities in practice. The goal of this research is to study the conditions and identify the problems of the legal regulation of receiving remuneration (gifts) in connection with the performance of official duties that prevent the implementation of anti-corruption criminological security. The authors use the legal theory of security measures to analyze the provisions of Clause 3, Part 1, Art. 575 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and Clause 6, Part 1, Art. 17 of the Federal Law "About the Public Civil Service in the Russian Federation", examine the doctrinal approaches to defining the priority of enforcing the above-mentioned norms, study the significant features of the category "ordinary gift" and conduct its evaluation from the standpoint of differentiating between gifts and bribes, also in connection with the criteria of the insignificance of the corruption deed. The empirical basis of the study is the decisions of courts of general jurisdiction. The authors also used their experience of working in Commissions on the observance of professional behavior and the resolution of conflicts of interests at different levels. The conducted research allowed the authors to come to the following fundamental conclusions: 1) the special security rule under Clause 6, Part 1, Art. 17 of the Federal Law "About the Public Civil Service in the Russian Federation", which sets a full prohibition for government employees to receive remuneration (gifts) in connection with the performance of official duties, contradicts Clause 3, Part 1, Art. 575 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (the existing legal-linguistic vagueness of categories in Art. 575 of the CC of the RF leads to problems in law enforcement and makes a negative impact on the anti-corruption mentality of people); 2) as the concepts "gift" and "bribe" do not logically intersect, the development of additional normative legal criteria for their delineation seems to be unpromising and will lead to a new wave of scholastic and practical disagreements; 3) the introduction of a uniform and blanket ban on receiving remuneration (gifts) in the public sphere by eliminating Clause 3, Part 1, Art. 575 of the CC of the RF seems to be an effective measure of preventing bribery, and its application is justified until Russian society develops sustainable anti-corruption mentality.
Журнал: RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY
Выпуск журнала: Vol. 14, Is. 5
Номера страниц: 660-675
ISSN журнала: 25004255
Место издания: IRKUTSK
Издатель: BAIKAL STATE UNIV