Тип публикации: статья из журнала
Год издания: 2017
Идентификатор DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/38/8
Ключевые слова: globalization, corporativity archetype, the Self, double standards, social instincts
Аннотация: In the formation of any group identity is enabled the collective unconscious program, transforming the archetypical image of "I and the World" in the archetypical image of "We and the World". This program, embedded the individual Self in the Self group, we have called the archetype of corporativity. The current globalization procesПоказать полностьюs can substantiate the same archetypical programs that worked before. The Western world, as the subject of its globalization project, in full compliance with the archetypical program of corporativity seeks to make its own We-Self in the "universal-all-of-us-Self". If any we-group doesn't fit in all the world's leading standards, it should be "civilize". And as long as it will not be "tightened" to the appropriate standards its members should be regarded still-not-quite-human. Corporativity archetype is involved in any Globalization project, with dialectically contradictory manner. On the one hand, it provides the possibility of its supporters existential experience of belonging to a potentially very powerful universal Self. On the other hand, the program starts the archetypical mechanisms bias - positive to "ours" negative and even hostile to the "others". We can assume that overcoming the contradictions generated by the archetype of corporativity will promote through the popular at the moment project of humanity unification into a single entity in the face of the so-called global threats. However, the implementation of this project is possible only if the imperatives of the universal "we-self" will be stronger than the imperatives of its constituent smaller selves, that would reliably block the work of the archetypical program "ours-others" on the levels of the we-groups included in the humanity. And this is unlikely to happen before a global catastrophe. Anyway, the solution to this problem is impossible without strengthening the cultural and symbolic components in the bundle of collective rational and collective unconscious, which instrumentally is rather formidable task.
Журнал: VESTNIK TOMSKOGO GOSUDARSTVENNOGO UNIVERSITETA-FILOSOFIYA-SOTSIOLOGIYA-POLITOLOGIYA-TOMSK STATE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY SOCIOLOGY AND POLITICAL SCIENCE
Выпуск журнала: Vol. 38
Номера страниц: 71-78
ISSN журнала: 1998863X
Место издания: TOMSK
Издатель: TOMSK STATE UNIV